← Back to home

Research

Entrepreneurship as a motivational process.

My research examines the intersection of entrepreneurship and motivational processes. I study how individuals and teams initiate, sustain, and adapt entrepreneurial efforts under uncertainty — how founders choose goals, form teams, coordinate effort, implement creative ideas, respond to feedback, and revise their venture paths over time.

Under Review

Clark, K., Lazar, M., Chen, G., & Goldfarb, B. Promoting gains or preventing losses? The effect of regulatory focus on implementing creative business ideas in new venture teams.

Resubmitted, 1st-round R&R at Organization Science

Creativity alone often isn't enough — novel ideas are hard to implement under uncertainty. We show how venture-level regulatory focus shapes whether entrepreneurial teams carry creative ideas forward into action.

Clark, K., & Chen, G. The motivational underpinnings of entrepreneurial teams. In P. Ackerman & M. Beier (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulation at work: A celebration of the life and contributions of Ruth Kanfer.

Under review · Expected 2027

A handbook chapter using core motivation theories — goal setting, self-determination, expectancy-value — to explain phenomena across the venture creation process as a dynamic sequence of goal choice, striving, and adjustment.

Works in Progress

Clark, K., Chen, G., & Lazar, M. Learning to pivot: How psychological ownership shapes outcomes in new ventures.

Dissertation proposal

The same attachment that motivates founders to persist can make it hard for them to revise their ideas. I study how psychological ownership of a venture's business idea shapes teams' responses to ambiguous feedback, and how learning goal orientation determines whether that ownership becomes defensiveness or adaptive change.

Lazar, M., Clark, K., Chen, G., Goldfarb, B., & Agarwal, R. Entrepreneurial team adaptation.

Third study — data collection

A dynamic model of founding team formation. Teams can compensate for their initial strategy — adding relational strength when they began with resource seeking, or instrumental capacity when they began with interpersonal attraction.

Clark, K., & Derfler-Rozin, R. Shame on you? How shaming and pride-inducing strategies impact corporate charitable behavior.

Reworking Study 1

How different social-emotional appeals shape whether organizations engage in prosocial and charitable behavior.

Recent Conference Presentations

  • Clark, K. P. (2026, July). Learning to pivot: How high-ownership entrepreneurs adapt through commitment. 86th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Philadelphia, PA.
  • Clark, K. P., Chen, G., & Goldfarb, B. (2025, July). Regulatory focus and actualizing creative business ideas in new venture teams. 85th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Clark, K. P., Chen, G., Lazar, M., & Goldfarb, B. (2024, July). Promoting gains or preventing losses? 40th EGOS Colloquium, Milan, Italy.